Business for New Europe All articles
Investment & Expansion

Seven Central European Cities UK Founders Are Using as EU Launchpads

Business for New Europe
Seven Central European Cities UK Founders Are Using as EU Launchpads

Photo: WeAreCEU, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Central Europe has become a familiar phrase in UK boardrooms, but the investment map is shifting. For founders who need an EU entity, a local engineering team or a distribution base, capital cities are not always the best first step. Second cities often offer shorter hiring cycles, lower office costs and access to universities, while still sitting within reach of major markets. The seven cities below are not interchangeable. Each has a different labour market, incentive regime and administrative temperament.

The figures in this guide are indicative. Salary ranges, office costs and grant availability move quickly, and UK founders should test them with local advisers before committing capital.

Wrocław, Poland

Wrocław has become a default choice for UK companies that want Polish talent without Warsaw prices. The city has a deep pool of engineers, shared-service staff and software developers, supported by local universities and a large installed base of foreign employers. Mid-level software salaries are generally below Warsaw levels, although competition for senior engineers is real.

Poland’s investment-zone support can be relevant for larger projects, but smaller founders should not assume that grants are automatic. Employment law, payroll and Polish-language administration require local advice. On transport, Wrocław’s Copernicus Airport has UK connections, while the A4 motorway and rail links make Germany and Berlin accessible.

Brno, Czech Republic

Brno is the Czech Republic’s second city and a serious engineering and cybersecurity hub. It offers lower costs than Prague and a strong university pipeline. For UK founders in software, industrial technology or shared services, Brno can provide a credible EU base without the capital’s overheads.

Czech investment incentives are available for some projects, but eligibility depends on sector, location and job creation. The regulatory quirks are familiar to anyone who has worked in Central Europe: trade licensing, employment documentation and Czech-language administration all need local support. Brno’s own airport is limited, so founders often use Vienna or Bratislava airports and the rail network to Prague and Vienna.

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Cluj-Napoca has built a reputation as Romania’s technology and outsourcing centre. It offers a large graduate pool, lower employment costs than Poland’s major cities and an active startup scene. UK founders often use Cluj for software development, customer support and back-office functions.

Romania’s regional aid regime can support investment, but the administrative process can be slower than in Poland or the Czech Republic. Founders should budget time for entity setup, accounting and local employment formalities. Cluj’s airport has international connections, including UK routes, and the city is well placed for road and rail access to Hungary and western Romania.

Košice, Slovakia

Košice is an industrial city with a growing IT and engineering base. It offers some of the lower operating costs in the region and a useful position close to the Slovak-Hungarian border. For UK manufacturers or technical service firms, it can be a cost-effective bridgehead into Central European supply chains.

Slovak investment incentives can be meaningful for manufacturing and shared services, but the paperwork is not light. Slovak-language administration and labour-code compliance are practical considerations. Transport is mixed: Košice has an airport with limited routes, so many companies rely on rail and road links to Bratislava, Vienna and Budapest.

Kaunas, Lithuania

Kaunas has become a quiet favourite for UK founders who want a Lithuanian base without Vilnius prices. The city has a free economic zone, a strong engineering and logistics profile, and a growing reputation for fintech and software. Lithuania’s digital public services make company administration relatively straightforward for a market in the region.

Incentives in the Kaunas free economic zone can be attractive for qualifying investors, but founders should check state-aid rules and eligibility carefully. Lithuanian employment and tax rules require local advice, although the administrative burden is generally manageable. Kaunas Airport has UK connections, and the Via Baltica corridor supports road transport towards Poland and the Baltic states.

Poznań, Poland

Poznań is a logistics and manufacturing hub in western Poland, with lower costs than Warsaw and strong links to Germany. It suits UK founders in industrial technology, distribution and business services. The city has a solid university base and a practical, commercial culture.

Polish investment-zone support may be available for job-creating projects, but smaller operations often rely on local co-working, payroll providers and advisers rather than grants. Poznań’s airport has UK routes, and the A2 motorway makes Berlin reachable by road. For companies selling into Germany, that geography is a genuine advantage.

Gdańsk, Poland

Gdańsk combines a port, an industrial base and a growing technology sector. It is particularly relevant for UK founders in logistics, offshore services and software. The city has lower costs than Warsaw and a strong maritime and engineering identity.

Incentives follow Poland’s investment-zone model, with eligibility depending on the project. Founders should expect Polish-language administration and local employment formalities. Gdańsk Airport has UK connections, the port supports freight, and rail links connect the city to Warsaw and the wider Polish network.

The 90-day market test

A 90-day test is long enough to validate a city and short enough to avoid an expensive false start. In the first 30 days, define the specific function you need to locate, speak to at least 15 potential customers or partners, and ask two local advisers to benchmark employment costs and entity options. Do not rely on headline salary data alone; total employment cost includes employer contributions, benefits, office space and accounting.

In days 31 to 60, shortlist two cities and visit both. Meet a payroll provider, a tax adviser, a university careers office and at least one founder already operating locally. Request written indications on incentives and confirm whether your project is eligible before signing any lease.

In days 61 to 90, run a paid pilot or a small hiring test. Confirm the entity structure, banking arrangements and data-protection position. Then make a go or no-go decision with a full-year budget. The most common mistake is signing a long lease before the sales pipeline or hiring market has been tested.

Practical checklist for UK founders

Decide whether you need an EU entity before revenue, or whether a distributor or local partner can test the market first. Model total employment cost rather than salary. Check incentive eligibility before committing to premises. Confirm language requirements for payroll, contracts and regulatory filings. Test transport links against your actual customer locations. Budget for local accounting and legal support.

Central Europe’s second cities reward preparation. They are not cheaper versions of capital cities; they are distinct markets with their own talent pools and administrative habits. UK founders who treat them as serious bridgeheads, rather than back-office shortcuts, tend to get the most from them.

All Articles

Related Articles

Five Administrative Pitfalls That Can Delay UK CBAM Consignments in 2026

Five Administrative Pitfalls That Can Delay UK CBAM Consignments in 2026